Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38159813›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of nutrition2024

Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review.

Nirjhar R Ghosh, Zahra Esmaeilinezhad, Joanna Zając, Rebecca A Creasy, Saundra G Lorenz, Kevin C Klatt, Malgorzata M Bala, Karen M Beathard, Bradley C Johnston

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nirjhar R GhoshDepartment of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Zahra EsmaeilinezhadDepartment of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Joanna ZającDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Rebecca A CreasyDepartment of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Saundra G LorenzDepartment of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Kevin C KlattDepartment of Nutrition Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Malgorzata M BalaDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Karen M BeathardDepartment of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Bradley C JohnstonDepartment of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA. Electronic address: bradley.johnston@tamu.edu.

Funding

Evidence-based Nutrition Education and Research Guidance (ENER-G)R25DK130848 · NIDDK · NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL MEDICINE · PI Clinton D Allred, Heather Lea Zwickey · 2023 to 2026
$425k
NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK130848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) promotes shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

objectiveThe aim was to determine EBP competencies among nutrition professionals and students reported in the literature.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review by searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, BIOSIS Citation Index, and clinicaltrials.gov up to March 2023. Eligible primary studies had to assess one of the 6 predefined EBP competencies: formulating clinical questions; searching literature for best evidence; assessing studies for methodological quality; effect size; certainty of evidence for effects; and determining the applicability of study results considering patient values and preferences. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, and results were summarized for each EBP competency.

resultsWe identified 12 eligible cross-sectional survey studies, comprising 1065 participants, primarily registered dietitians, across 6 countries, with the majority assessed in the United States (n = 470). The reporting quality of the survey studies was poor overall, with 43% of items not reported. Only 1 study (8%) explicitly used an objective questionnaire to assess EBP competencies. In general, the 6 competencies were incompletely defined or reported (e.g., it was unclear what applicability and critical appraisal referred to and what study designs were appraised by the participants). Two core competencies, interpreting effect size and certainty of evidence for effects, were not assessed.

conclusionsThe overall quality of study reports was poor, and the questionnaires were predominantly self-perceived, as opposed to objective assessments. No studies reported on competencies in interpreting effect size or certainty of evidence, competencies essential for optimizing clinical nutrition decision-making. Future surveys should objectively assess core EBP competencies using sensible, specific questionnaires. Furthermore, EBP competencies need to be standardized across dietetic programs to minimize heterogeneity in the training, understanding, evaluation, and application among dietetics practitioners. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022311916.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEvidence-Based PracticeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNutritionistsStudentsclinical nutritionevidence-based dietetic practicesevidence-based practice competencies in nutritionevidence-based practice implementation in dieteticshealth care

Identifiers

PMID38159813
PMCPMC11347811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.