Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38159432›Full record

ArticleTicks and tick-borne diseases2024

A longitudinal transcriptomic analysis of Rhipicephalus microplus midgut upon feeding.

Stephen Lu, Jéssica Waldman, Luís Fernando Parizi, Itabajara da Silva Vaz Junior, Lucas Tirloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Situ Localization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen LuVector Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jéssica WaldmanCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade and Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), RS, Brazil.
Luís Fernando PariziCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade and Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), RS, Brazil.
Itabajara da Silva Vaz JuniorCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade and Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), RS, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia - Entomologia Molecular, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lucas TirloniTick-Pathogen Transmission Unit, Laboratory of Bacteriology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, MT, United States. Electronic address: lucas.tirloni@nih.gov.

Funding

Tick saliva and its importance for tick feeding and pathogen transmissionZIAAI001337 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI TIRLONI, LUCAS · 2021 to 2025
$8.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI001337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhipicephalus microplus, a highly host-specific tick that primarily feeds on cattle, posing a significant threat to livestock production. The investigation of tick physiology is crucial for identifying potential targets in tick control. Of particular interest adult female ticks undergo a significant expansion of the midgut during feeding, leading to an over 100-fold increase in body weight. Beyond the functions of storing and digesting blood meals, the tick midgut plays a crucial role in acquiring and transmitting pathogens. However, our understanding of tick midgut physiology remains limited. In this study we conducted a comprehensive longitudinal transcriptome analysis of the midgut from adult female R. microplus ticks collected at various feeding stages, providing an overview of the transcriptional modulation in this organ as feeding progress. By employing a de novo assembly approach followed by coding-sequences (CDS) extraction, 60,599 potential CDS were identified. In preparation for functional annotation and differential expression analysis, transcripts that showed an average transcript per million (TPM) ≥ 3 in at least one of the biological conditions were extracted. This selection process resulted in a total of 10,994 CDS, which were categorized into 24 functional classes. Notably, our differential expression analysis revealed three main transcriptional profiles. In the first one, representing the slow-feeding stage, the most abundant functional classes were the "protein synthesis" and "secreted" groups, reflecting the highly active state of the tick midgut. The second profile partially accounts for the rapid-feeding stage, in which a high number of differentially expressed transcripts was observed. Lastly, the third transcriptional profile represents post-detached ticks. Notably the highest number of modulated transcripts was observed up to 48 h post-detachment (hpd), however no major differences was observed up to 168 hpd. Overall, the data presented here offers a temporal insight into tick midgut physiology, contributing to the identification of potential targets for the development of anti-tick control strategies.

Indexed as

RhipicephalusAnimalsCattleDigestive SystemFemaleGene Expression ProfilingBlood meal digestionMidgutRNA-sequencingTicks

Identifiers

PMID38159432
PMCPMC10947743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.