ArticlePhysical therapy2024
Automation of Functional Mobility Assessments at Home Using a Multimodal Sensor System Integrating Inertial Measurement Units and Computer Vision (IMU-Vision).
Article in Physical therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Across the Patient and Client Management Model.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Development of a Hospital-at-Home Digital Twin for Patients With Frailty: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFunctional movement assessments are routinely used to evaluate and track changes in mobility. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multimodal movement monitoring system developed for autonomous, home-based, functional movement assessment.
methodsFifty frail and prefrail adults were recruited from the Brigham and Women's Hospital at Home program to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of applying the multimodal movement monitoring system to autonomously recognize and score functional activities collected in the home. Study subjects completed sit-to-stand, standing balance (Romberg, semitandem, and tandem), and walking test activities in likeness to the Short Physical Performance Battery. Test activities were identified and scored manually and by the multimodal movement monitoring system's activity recognition and scoring algorithms, which were previously trained on lab-based biomechanical data to integrate wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) and external red-blue-green-depth vision data. Feasibility was quantified as the proportion of completed tests that were analyzable. Accuracy was quantified as the degree of agreement between the actual and system-identified activities. In an exploratory analysis of a subset of functional activity data, the accuracy of a preliminary activity-scoring algorithm was also evaluated.
resultsActivity recognition by the IMU-vision system had good feasibility and high accuracy. Of 271 test activities collected in the home, 217 (80%) were analyzable by the activity-recognition algorithm, which overall correctly identified 206 (95%) of the analyzable activities: 100% of walking, 97% of balance, and 82% of sit-to-stand activities (χ2(2) = 19.9). In the subset of 152 tests suitable for activity scoring, automatic and manual scores showed substantial agreement (Kw = 0.76 [0.69, 0.83]).
conclusionsAutonomous recognition and scoring of home-based functional activities is enabled by a multimodal movement monitoring system that integrates inertial measurement unit and vision data. Further algorithm training with ecologically valid data and a kitted system that is independently usable by patients are needed before fully autonomous, functional movement assessment is realizable. IMPACT: Functional movement assessments that can be administered in the home without a clinician present have the potential to democratize these evaluations and improve care access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.