Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38158850›Full record

ArticleCancer science2024

Effectiveness of catch-up and routine program of the 9-valent vaccine on cervical cancer risk reduction in Japan.

Asami Yagi, Satoshi Nakagawa, Yutaka Ueda, Emiko Oka, Sayaka Ikeda, Mamoru Kakuda, Eiji Kobayashi, Yuri Ito, Kayoko Katayama, Kei Hirai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating Behavioral Impacts of School Cancer Education Programs Several Months and Years After Implementation in Japan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Asami YagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-5963
Satoshi NakagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Emiko OkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Sayaka IkedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-8990
Mamoru KakudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Eiji KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University Graduate School of Medicine, Ufu, Oita, Japan.
Yuri ItoDepartment of Medical Statistics, Research and Development Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Oita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-2393
Kayoko KatayamaFaculty of Informatics, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Kei HiraiClinical Psychology, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Tomio NakayamaCenter for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-5096
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPGunma University · JPOita University · JPOsaka University of Human Sciences · JP

Funding

A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant 23EA1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, the national human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization program began. However, in June 2013, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) announced a "temporary" suspension of its recommendation for the human papillomavirus vaccine. Finally, in November 2021, the MHLW ended its suspension of the recommendation of the HPV vaccine. To address the 9-year gap in HPV vaccinations the suspension had caused, the MHLW conducted a program of catch-up vaccinations from April 2022 to March 2025. Finally, in April 2023, the 9-valent HPV vaccine was approved for both the routine and catch-up vaccination programs in Japan. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of the introduction of the 9-valent vaccine on the increased risk of cervical cancer in females born after fiscal year (FY) 2000. We estimated the lifetime relative risk of cervical cancer incidence and death using the improved routine and catch-up vaccination rates after the recent resumption of the governmental recommendation for women and girls to have the HPV vaccination. These relative risks were calculated using a lifetime risk of 1.000 for cervical cancer incidence and death for females born in FY 1993. We predicted that even if a 90% vaccination rate were to be achieved by FY 2024 with the 9-valent vaccine among women born between FY 2000 and FY 2005, the risk would remain higher than for the vaccination generation. Therefore, for women born between FY 2000 and FY 2005, it will be necessary to significantly improve the cervical cancer screening rate to compensate for this increased risk.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsJapanRisk Reduction BehaviorPapillomavirus Vaccinescervical cancerhealth communicationHPV vaccineJapansuspension of recommendation

Identifiers

PMID38158850
PMCPMC10920980
OpenAlexW4390450226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.