Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38158647›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2024

Effect of intraoperative abdominal lavage versus suction alone on postoperative wound infection in patients with appendicitis: A meta-analysis.

Haiyan Wu, Xiujuan Chen, Yanhong Ren, Fengyong Yang

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haiyan WuDepartment of pharmacy, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9035-6665
Xiujuan ChenDepartment of pharmacy, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Yanhong RenDepartment of pharmacy, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Fengyong YangDepartment of Emergency, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Shandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2021MH329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is much controversy about the application of abdominal irrigation in the prevention of wound infection (WI) and intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) in the postoperative period. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the effect of suctioning and lavage on appendectomy to assess the efficacy of either suctioning or lavage. Data were collected and estimated with RevMan 5.3 software. Based on our research, we found 563 publications in our database, and we eventually chose seven of them to analyse. The main results were IAA after the operation and WI. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials of an appendectomy with suctioning or lavage. In the end, seven trials were chosen to meet the eligibility criteria, and the majority were retrospective. The results of seven studies showed that there was no statistically significant difference between abdominal lavage and suctioning treatment for post-operative WI (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.40, 2.61; p = 0.96); There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the risk of postoperative abdominal abscess after operation (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.89; p = 0.56). No evidence has been found that the use of abdominal lavage in the treatment of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy is superior to aspiration.

Indexed as

Abdominal AbscessAppendicitisLaparoscopyAppendectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSuctionSurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic Irrigationappendicitisintra‐abdominal abscesslavagewound infection

Identifiers

PMID38158647
PMCPMC10961855
OpenAlexW4390449511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.