Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38158424›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Comparing fully automated AI body composition measures derived from thin and thick slice CT image data.

Matthew H Lee, Daniel Liu, John W Garrett, Alberto Perez, Ryan Zea, Ronald M Summers, Perry J Pickhardt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automated Deep Learning Detection of Hepatic Steatosis on Noncontrast Computed Tomography Scans and Discrepancy With Scan Reports.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Enhanced muscle and fat segmentation for CT-based body composition analysis: a comparative study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew H LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. mlee5@uwhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8500-0306
Daniel LiuDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
John W GarrettDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Alberto PerezDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Ryan ZeaDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Ronald M SummersNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Perry J PickhardtDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for CT ColonographyZIACL040003 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare fully automated artificial intelligence body composition measures derived from thin (1.25 mm) and thick (5 mm) slice abdominal CT data.

methodsIn this retrospective study, fully automated CT-based body composition algorithms for quantifying bone attenuation, muscle attenuation, muscle area, liver attenuation, liver volume, spleen volume, visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR) and aortic calcium were applied to both thin (1.25 × 0.625 mm) and thick (5 × 3 mm) abdominal CT series from two patient cohorts: unenhanced scans in asymptomatic adults undergoing colorectal cancer screening, and post-contrast scans in patients with colorectal cancer. Body composition measures derived from thin and thick slice data were compared, including correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsA total of 9882 CT scans (mean age, 57.0 years; 4527 women, 5355 men) were evaluated, including 8947 non-contrast and 935 contrast-enhanced CT exams. Very strong positive correlation was observed for all soft tissue measures: muscle attenuation (r

conclusionAutomated body composition measures derived from thin and thick abdominal CT data are strongly correlated and show agreement, particularly for soft tissue applications, making it feasible to use either series for these CT-based body composition algorithms.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCalciumAdultBody CompositionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumAbdominal CTAIBody compositionThick sliceThin slice

Identifiers

PMID38158424
OpenAlexW4390402594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.