Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38158404›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Current MR imaging of cartilage in the context of knee osteoarthritis (part 1) : Principles and sequences].

Teresa Lemainque, Marc Sebastian Huppertz, Can Yüksel, Robert Siepmann, Christiane Kuhl, Frank Roemer, Daniel Truhn, Sven Nebelung

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Teresa LemainqueKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Marc Sebastian HuppertzKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Can YükselKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Robert SiepmannKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Christiane KuhlKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Frank RoemerRadiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen & Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schloßplatz 4, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Daniel TruhnKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Sven NebelungKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. snebelung@ukaachen.de.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the clinical method of choice for cartilage imaging in the context of degenerative and nondegenerative joint diseases. The MRI-based definitions of osteoarthritis rely on the detection of osteophytes, cartilage pathologies, bone marrow edema and meniscal lesions but currently a scientific consensus is lacking. In the clinical routine proton density-weighted, fat-suppressed 2D turbo spin echo sequences with echo times of 30-40 ms are predominantly used, which are sufficiently sensitive and specific for the assessment of cartilage. The additionally acquired T1-weighted sequences are primarily used for evaluating other intra-articular and periarticular structures. Diagnostically relevant artifacts include magic angle and chemical shift artifacts, which can lead to artificial signal enhancement in cartilage or incorrect representations of the subchondral lamina and its thickness. Although scientifically validated, high-resolution 3D gradient echo sequences (for cartilage segmentation) and compositional MR sequences (for quantification of physical tissue parameters) are currently reserved for scientific research questions. The future integration of artificial intelligence techniques in areas such as image reconstruction (to reduce scan times while maintaining image quality), image analysis (for automated identification of cartilage defects), and image postprocessing (for automated segmentation of cartilage in terms of volume and thickness) will significantly improve the diagnostic workflow and advance the field further.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesOsteoarthritis, KneeArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtificial intelligenceComputer-assisted image processingJoint cartilageMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID38158404
OpenAlexW4390398770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.