Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38157981›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2024

Partial Egg Consumption Modifies the Diagnostic Performance of Allergy Tests to Predict Outcome of Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges to Egg.

Andreina Marques-Mejias, Suzana Radulovic, Ru-Xin Foong, Irene Bartha, Marta Krawiec, Matthew Kwok, Zainab Jama, Faye Harrison, Cristian Ricci, Gideon Lack and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03309488 (Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03309488 unknown statusnot on this map

Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2018 to 2021Enrolled600ConditionsFood Allergy, Food Allergy in Infants, Food Allergy in Children, Food Allergen SensitisationArmsOral food challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. The future of food allergy diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreina Marques-MejiasDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Suzana RadulovicDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Ru-Xin FoongDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Irene BarthaDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Marta KrawiecDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Matthew KwokDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Zainab JamaDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Faye HarrisonDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Cristian RicciAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research (AUTHeR), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Gideon LackDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
George Du ToitDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Alexandra F SantosDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: alexandra.santos@kcl.ac.uk.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBNorth-West University · ZA

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902018Medical Research Council MC_PC_18052Medical Research Council MR/M008517/1Medical Research Council MR/T032081/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children are consuming some egg when they are diagnosed with egg allergy. We hypothesized that egg consumption could modify the diagnostic performance of allergy tests.

objectiveTo stratify diagnostic performance of tests according to egg consumption status.

methodsThe BAT2 study (NCT03309488) participants underwent oral food challenge (OFC), food-frequency questionnaires, skin prick test (SPT), specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and specific immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) and basophil activation test (BAT).

resultsAt study entry, 45% of participants reported partial egg consumption ("consumers") and 55% were avoiding egg strictly ("avoiders"). Avoiders had larger SPT (P < .001), higher BAT to egg (P < .001), sIgE to egg white (EW; P = .001) and to ovalbumin (OVA; P = .001), but not to ovomucoid (P = .231). Consumers had higher levels of sIgG4 to all egg allergens (P < .001) than avoiders. In consumers, the test with the best diagnostic performance was BAT (area under the curve [AUC] = .912) followed by SPT to raw egg (AUC = 0.805), EW-sIgE (AUC = 0.738), and OVA-sIgE (AUC = 0.732). In avoiders, the best tests were BAT (AUC = 0.834) and EW-sIgE (AUC = 0.833) followed by OVA-sIgE (AUC = 0.793) and SPT to EW (AUC=0.789). Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs, the proportion of patients requiring OFC were 33% for BAT, 53% for SPT to raw egg, 61% for OVA-sIgE, and 73% for EW-sIgE for consumers; and 73% for BAT, 79% for EW-sIgE, and 93% for SPT to EW for avoiders.

conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of tests is influenced by the immunomodulatory effect of egg consumption. BAT is the most reliable test and reduced the need for OFC, particularly in partial egg consumers.

Indexed as

Egg HypersensitivityEggsAllergensChildEgg WhiteHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GOvomucinSkin TestsAllergensImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GOvomucinBaked eggBasophil activation testEgg allergyEgg consumptionFood-frequency questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38157981
PMCPMC11129315
OpenAlexW4390276904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.