Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38157238›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Implementation Considerations for Family-Based Telehealth Interventions for Youth in Foster Care: Focus Group Study With Child Welfare System Professionals.

Hannah P Leo, Johanna B Folk, Christopher Rodriguez, Marina Tolou-Shams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah P LeoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-5616
Johanna B FolkDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-7307
Christopher RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-592X
Marina Tolou-ShamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-609X
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Mentoring to reduce substance use for youth in the juvenile justice system.K24DA046569 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MARINA TOLOU-SHAMS · 2019 to 2026
$1.5M
Reducing Parenting Stress to Facilitate Justice-Involved Youth’s Treatment EngagementK23DA050798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FOLK, JOHANNA BAILEY · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA050798NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA046569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween 2016 and 2020, over 600,000 youth were served annually by the foster care system. Despite approximately half of foster youth struggling with emotional or behavioral challenges, few receive much-needed services to address their mental health concerns. Family-based interventions are efficacious in addressing both youth and caregiver mental health needs; however, foster youth participation in these family-based interventions is limited by many barriers, including out-of-home placement far from their family of origin. Telehealth is a promising tool for mitigating barriers to access to treatment interventions for foster youth and their families.

objectiveThis study aims to understand child welfare system professionals' perspectives on enabling factors and barriers to providing family-based interventions via telehealth to youth in out-of-county foster care placement.

methodsThis qualitative study derived themes from 3 semistructured focus groups with child welfare system professionals. Participants were asked to discuss how family-based interventions are delivered to foster youth and their caregivers in their jurisdictions, as well as to share their thoughts about how to use telehealth to improve access to family-based interventions for families with youth in out-of-home placement. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and inductive thematic analysis, with the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations as the theoretical framework.

resultsParticipants were 19 child welfare system professionals (eg, social workers, residential treatment staff, and supervisors) who participated in 1 of the 3 focus groups (6-7/group). Most participants were women (n=13, 68%), White individuals (n=10, 53%), and social workers (n=8, 42%). On average, participants worked in the child welfare system for 16.6 (SD 8.3) years. Participants identified multilevel factors impacting family-based intervention delivery including environmental factors (eg, Medicare billing and presumptive transfer), predisposing characteristics (eg, psychological resources), enabling factors (eg, transportation and team-based youth-centered care), and need factors (eg, motivation to engage). Participants expressed optimism that telehealth could increase access to needed mental health care, diverse providers, and longevity of care while also expressing some concerns regarding telehealth access and literacy.

conclusionsChild welfare system professionals highlight the need to develop policies and telehealth interventions that are youth versus placement centered, include resources that limit barriers and bolster motivation for engagement, and follow a team-based care model. Findings from this study inform how telehealth can be used to increase access to and engagement with family-based interventions for youth in out-of-home placements and their caregivers of origin.

Indexed as

family-based interventionsfoster youthmental healthtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID38157238
PMCPMC10787329
OpenAlexW4390398425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.