Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38157202›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2024

Perception of illusory contours in children and adults: An eye-tracking study.

Michael Kavšek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael KavšekDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111, Bonn, Germany. kavsek@uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eye-tracking study investigated the perception of subjective Kanizsa and Ehrenstein figures in adults and in children aged 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and 9-11 years of age. More specifically, the distribution of looking at the inner stimulus part versus the inducing elements was measured for illusory figures, figures with real contours, and control displays. It was hypothesized that longer looking at the inner area of the illusory figures indicates global contour interpolation, whereas longer looking at the inducing elements indicates a local processing mode. According to the results, participants of all ages looked longer at the illusory Kanizsa and Ehrenstein contours than at the figures' inducing elements. However, performance was lowest in the children aged 3-4 years and increased during the preschool period. Moreover, the illusory contour displays elicited comparable visual responses as did the real contour displays. The use of the control displays that contained no contour information ensured that the participants' looking behavior was not driven by a spontaneous tendency to attend to the inner stimulus parts. The study confirms the view that sensitivity to illusory contours emerges very early in life.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualAdultAge FactorsAttentionChildChild, PreschoolEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleOrientationYoung AdultDevelopment of global versus local processingEhrenstein illusionEye trackingIllusory contour perceptionKanizsa illusionSubjective contour perception

Identifiers

PMID38157202
PMCPMC11480146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.