Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38157019›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2024

Multiparametric Analysis Combining DSC-MR Perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is Superior to a Single Parameter Approach for Differentiation of Progressive Glioma from Radiation Necrosis.

Jürgen Panholzer, Gertraud Malsiner-Walli, Bettina Grün, Ognian Kalev, Michael Sonnberger, Robert Pichler

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The confounding effects of microvascular physiology on the uptake and diagnostic accuracy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jürgen PanholzerDepartment of Neurology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria. juergen.panholzer@kepleruniklinikum.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-3665
Gertraud Malsiner-WalliInstitute for Statistics and Mathematics, WU University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina GrünInstitute for Statistics and Mathematics, WU University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
Ognian KalevDepartment for Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Michael SonnbergerDepartment for Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Robert PichlerDepartment for Nuclear Medicine, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerfusion-weighted (PWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O‑(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) positron emission tomography (PET) are both useful for discrimination of progressive disease (PD) from radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with gliomas. Previous literature showed that the combined use of FET-PET and MRI-PWI is advantageous; hhowever the increased diagnostic performances were only modest compared to the use of a single modality. Hence, the goal of this study was to further explore the benefit of combining MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET for differentiation of PD from RN. Secondarily, we evaluated the usefulness of cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) as previous studies mainly examined cerebral blood volume (CBV).

methodsIn this single center study, we retrospectively identified patients with WHO grades II-IV gliomas with suspected tumor recurrence, presenting with ambiguous findings on structural MRI. For differentiation of PD from RN we used both MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI-PWI provided normalized parameters derived from perfusion maps (r(relative)CBV, rCBF, rMTT, rTTP). Static [18F]FET-PET parameters including mean and maximum tumor to brain ratios (TBR

resultsAfter application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 37 patients in this study. Regarding the in-sample based approach, in single parameter analysis rTBR

conclusionA multiparametric MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET model consisting of TBR

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation InjuriesAdultAgedCerebrovascular CirculationDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNecrosis(18F)fluoroethyltyrosineRadiopharmaceuticalsTyrosineAmino acid PETAstrocytomaPerfusion mapsPseudoprogressionRadiation therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.