ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
A Study to Analyze Impact of Treatment Couch and Immobilization Devices on Surface Dose for Megavoltage Photon Beams.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of treatment couch and immobilization devices on surface dose for megavoltage photon beams. MATERIAL/
methodsPercentage surface dose (PSD) measurement was carried out in Elekta Synergy™ Linear accelerator using PTW Markus® Parallel plate ionization chamber of volume 0.05cm3 with water equivalent RW3 Slab phantom (PTW, Germany). The measurement depth was considered at 0.07mm. The reference PSD was measured at 0° gantry angle with 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2 field sizes and 100cm SSD for 4MV, 6MV and 15MV photon beams. For comparison, PSD measurement was carried out at 180° gantry angle inclusion of treatment couch (TC), All in One positioning system (AIO - PS) and Vac lok Cushions (VLC).
resultsBeam angle at 0°, for field sizes 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2 and 30×30cm2, the PSD was observed as 30.9%, 40.5%, 48.7% for 4MV; 23.7%, 33.8%, 42.2% for 6MV; and 17.0%, 29.6%, 38.6% for 15MV respectively. Beam angle at 180° with TC, an increase in PSD by maximum of 65.0% for 4MV, 64.9% for 6MV and 55.9% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle. The PSD increased when beam angle was 180° with TC and AIO - PS were 65.0% for 4MV, 67.4% for 6MV, and 60.9% for 15MV than 0° angle. Similarly, increased PSD for beam angle at 180° with TC and VLC were 66.8% for 4MV, 66.8% for 6MV and 61.3% for 15MV as compared to 0° angle.
conclusionFor all three-photon energies, at 180° gantry angle, the PSD increased significantly in case of TC, VLC, and AIO - PS for all the field sizes as compared to gantry angle at 0°. It is necessary to consider TC, AIO - PS and VLC during dose calculation to ensure accuracy of patient treatment delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.