Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156554›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the 2018 Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Recalls and Subsequent Drug Shortages in Patients With Hypertension.

Joshua W Devine, Mina Tadrous, Inmaculada Hernandez, Katherine Callaway Kim, Scott D Rothenberger, Nandita Mukhopadhyay, Walid F Gellad, Katie J Suda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua W DevineDes Moines University Department of Public Health Des Moines IA USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1508-3846
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-6129
Inmaculada HernandezUniversity of California San Diego School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences La Jolla CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-4986
Katherine Callaway KimDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-6165
Scott D RothenbergerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.
Nandita MukhopadhyayUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-9536
Walid F GelladDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.
Katie J SudaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8977-1850
University of Pittsburgh · USIowa Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Impact of COVID-19 on Drug ShortagesR01HS027985 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SUDA, KJ · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValsartan was recalled by the US Food and Drug Administration in July 2018 for carcinogenic impurities, resulting in a drug shortage and management challenges for valsartan users. The influence of the valsartan recall on clinical outcomes is unknown. We compared the risk of adverse events between hypertensive patients using valsartan and a propensity score-matched group using nonrecalled angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. METHODS AND

resultsWe used Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Datamart (July 2017-January 2019). Hypertensive patients who received valsartan or nonrecalled angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for 1 year before and on the recall date were compared. Primary outcomes were measured in the 6 months following the recall and included: (1) a composite measure of all-cause hospitalization, all-cause emergency department visit, and all-cause urgent care visit, and (2) a composite cardiac event measure of hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction and hospitalizations/emergency department visits/urgent care visits for stroke/transient ischemic attack, heart failure, or hypertension. We compared the risk of outcomes between treatment groups using Cox proportional hazard models. Of the hypertensive patients, 76 934 received valsartan, and 509 472 received a nonrecalled angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Valsartan use at the time of recall was associated with a higher risk of all-cause hospitalization, emergency department use, or urgent care use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]) and the composite of cardiac events (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.15-1.29]) within 6 months after the recall.

conclusionsThe valsartan recall and shortage affected hypertensive patients. Local- and national-level systems need to be enhanced to protect patients from drug shortages by providing safe and reliable medication alternatives.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHypertensionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsHumansRetrospective StudiesTetrazolesValsartanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBiphenyl CompoundsTetrazolesValsartandrug recalldrug shortageshypertensionvalsartan

Identifiers

PMID38156554
PMCPMC10863811
OpenAlexW4390397849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.