ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Aortic Characteristic Impedance and Suspected Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Community-Based Healthy Population.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of characteristic impedance in carotid stiffness and cognitive dysfunction: interaction with proximal aortic stiffness.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Correlation between thyroid hormone levels and cognitive dysfunction in older patients with subclinical hypothyroidism : A matched groups retrospective study.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAging of the proximal aorta can lead to increased pressure and flow pulsatility in the cerebral microcirculation, which may cause cognitive impairment. This study investigated the association between aortic characteristic impedance (Zc), an indicator of regional stiffness of the proximal aorta, and suspected mild cognitive impairment (MCI), compared with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV). METHODS AND
resultsA total of 1461 healthy community residents (46.4% men; age range, 35-96 years [mean±SD, 59.9±11.8 years]) without a history of cardiovascular events or stroke were included in the study. Zc was estimated using applanation tonometry and echocardiography. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Education-adjusted cut points were used to define suspected MCI. Subjects with suspected MCI (n=493 [33.7%]) had significantly higher Zc and CFPWV than those without. In multivariable analysis, both Zc and CFPWV were inversely associated with Mini-Mental State Examination score. Zc (odds ratio per 1 SD, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.37] and CFPWV (odds ratio per 1 SD, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.01-1.38]) was also significantly associated with suspected MCI, after adjusting for age, sex, education level, mean arterial pressure, hypertension, diabetes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and smoking status. In joint analysis, Zc was significantly associated with suspected MCI, but CFPWV was not. In the age subgroups of <50 years and 50 to 70 years, only Zc was significantly associated with suspected MCI.
conclusionsThis study found that Zc was significantly associated with Mini-Mental State Examination score and suspected MCI, especially in younger and middle-aged adults. These findings suggest that Zc may be a useful biomarker for identifying individuals at risk for MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.