Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156513›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2024

Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes.

Dana B Mukamel, Heather Ladd, Debra Saliba, R Tamara Konetzka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nursing Home Profit Status and Pain Among Residents Living With Dementia.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The National Dementia Workforce Study: Overview.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  5. A National Survey of Nursing Home Clinicians to Explain Increased Valproate Prescribing.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Untangling the complex web of avoidable nursing home-to-hospital transfers of residents with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana B MukamelDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-5785
Heather LaddDepartment of Medicine, iTEQC Research Program, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Debra SalibaLos Angeles Borun Center at David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
R Tamara KonetzkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-1318

Funding

Staffing and Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes for Residents with and without DementiaR01AG066742 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MUKAMEL, DANA B · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066742NIA NIH HHS R01AG066742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingA national sample of nursing homes during 2017-2019 (pre-COVID). Data included the Payroll-Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long-Term Care Focus. STUDY

designRetrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long-term facility-level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident-day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsHospital-based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low-census dementia facilities, although, high- and low-dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low- and high-dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low- and high-dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low- and high-dementia census facilities.

Indexed as

DementiaNursing HomesNursing StaffPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingQuality of Health CareAgedFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesdementianursing homesoutcomespolicyqualitystaffing

Identifiers

PMID38156513
PMCPMC11250382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.