ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Automated Bioanalytical Workflow for Ligand Binding-Based Pharmacokinetic Assay Development.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The growth of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) continues to accelerate due to their success as treatments for many diseases. As new therapeutics are developed, it is increasingly important to have robust bioanalytical methods to measure the pharmacokinetics (PK) of circulating therapeutic mAbs in serum. Ligand-binding assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-IDs) targeting the variable regions of the therapeutic antibody are sensitive and specific bioanalytical methods to measure levels of therapeutic antibodies in a biological matrix. However, soluble circulating drug mAb targets can interfere with the anti-IDs binding to the therapeutic mAb, thereby resulting in an underestimation of total drug concentration. Therefore, in addition to a high binding affinity for the mAb, the selection of anti-IDs and the assay format that are not impacted by soluble antigens and have low matrix interference is essential for developing a robust PK assay. Standardized automated approaches to screen and select optimal reagents and assay formats are critical to increase efficiency, quality, and PK assay robustness. However, there does not exist an integrated screening and analysis platform to develop robust PK assays across multiple formats. We have developed an automated workflow and scoring platform with multiple bioanalytical assay parameters that allow for ranking of candidate anti-IDs. A primary automated indirect electrochemiluminescence (ECL) was utilized to shortlist the anti-IDs that were selected for labeling and screening in pairs. A secondary screen using an ECL sandwich assay with labeled-anti-ID pairings was used to test multiple PK assay formats to identify the best anti-ID pairing/PK assay format. We developed an automated assay using fixed plate maps combined with a human-guided graphical user interface-based scoring system and compared it to a data-dependent scoring system using Gaussian mixture models for automated scoring and selection. Our approach allowed for screening of anti-IDs and identification of the most robust PK assay format with significantly reduced time and resources compared with traditional approaches. We believe that such standardized, automated, and integrated platforms that accelerate the development of PK assays will become increasingly important for supporting future human clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.