Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156329›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2023

Timing Estimation and Limits in TOF-PET Detectors Producing Prompt Photons.

Francis Loignon-Houle, Maxime Toussaint, Émilie Bertrand, Félix Camirand Lemyre, Roger Lecomte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Status of Cherenkov-Based Gamma Detectors for TOF-PET and Proton Range Verification.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. High-performance dual-ended SiPM readout for TOF-PET with BGO and LYSO:Ce.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. TlCl:Be,I: a high sensitivity scintillation and Cherenkov radiator for TOF-PET.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francis Loignon-HouleSherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center of CRCHUS and with the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada, currently with Instituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular, Centro Mixto CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Maxime ToussaintSherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center of CRCHUS and with the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Émilie BertrandCRCHUS and with the Department of Mathematics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Félix Camirand LemyreCRCHUS and with the Department of Mathematics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Roger LecomteSherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center of CRCHUS and with the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada, and also with IR&T Inc., Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Funding

Ultra High Resolution Brain PET Scanner for in-vivo Autoradiography ImagingU01EB027003 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI EL FAKHRI, GEORGES, FONTAINE, RÉJEAN · 2018 to 2022
$4.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB027003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of prompt photons providing high photon time densities is a promising avenue to reach ultrahigh coincidence time resolution (CTR) in time-of-flight PET. Detectors producing prompt photons are receiving high interest experimentally, ignited by past exploratory theoretical studies that have anchored some guiding principles. Here, we aim to consolidate and extend the foundations for the analytical modeling of prompt generating detectors. We extend the current models to a larger range of prompt emission kinetics where more stringent requirements on the prompt photon yield rapidly emerge as a limiting factor. Lower bound and estimator evaluations are investigated with different underlying models, notably by merging or keeping separate the prompt and scintillation photon populations. We further show the potential benefits of knowing the proportion of prompt photons within a detection set to improve the CTR by mitigating the detrimental effect of population (prompt vs scintillation) mixing. Taking into account the fluctuations on the average number of detected prompt photons in the model reveals a limited influence when prompt photons are accompanied by fast scintillation (e.g., LSO:Ce:Ca) but a more significant effect when accompanied by slower scintillation (e.g., BGO). Establishing performance characteristics and limitations of prompt generating detectors is paramount to gauging and targeting the best possible timing capabilities they can offer.

Indexed as

prompt photonsScintillation detectorstime-of-flight PETtime resolution

Identifiers

PMID38156329
PMCPMC10751813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.