Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Cross-sectional study on the dissociation of decision-making capacity for antipsychotic treatment and COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with schizophrenia.

Stéphane Raffard, Sophie Bayard, Philippe Tattard, Yasmine Laraki, Delphine Capdevielle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stéphane RaffardUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, Montpellier, France.
Sophie BayardUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, Montpellier, France.
Philippe TattardUniversity Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Yasmine LarakiUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, Montpellier, France.
Delphine CapdevielleUniversity Department of Adult Psychiatry, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Decision-making capacity for treatment is impaired in schizophrenia but it remains unknown if schizophrenia affects distinct decision-making capacities differently. Methods: In this study, we assessed concomitantly two decision-making capacities (i.e., antipsychotic treatment and COVID-19 vaccination) in 27 schizophrenia patients. Sociodemographic variables, psychotic symptoms, global cognition and insight were also assessed. Results: We found that among individuals incompetent to consent to antipsychotic treatment, one-third had preserved capacity to consent to vaccination. No significant associations between the two different decision-making capacities were found. Psychotic symptoms and cognition were associated with the capacity to consent to antipsychotic treatment and to vaccination, respectively. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware that capacity to consent to treatment is not unidimensional and vary across domains in individuals with schizophrenia. Being incompetent regarding one treatment does not mean to be incompetent for another treatment in this clinical population.

Indexed as

antipsychoticmental capacityschizophreniatreatmentvaccination

Identifiers

PMID38156326
PMCPMC10753010
OpenAlexW4389742582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.