Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156248›Full record

ArticleAffective science2023

Category Flexibility in Emotion Learning.

Rista C Plate, Kristina Woodard, Seth D Pollak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Theory of Constructed Emotion: More Than a Feeling.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Calculated Feelings: How Children Use Probability to Infer Emotions.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rista C PlateDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-2459
Kristina WoodardDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-3829
Seth D PollakDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-9846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learners flexibly update category boundaries to adjust to the range of experiences they encounter. However, little is known about whether the degree of flexibility is consistent across domains. We examined whether categorization of social input, specifically emotions, is afforded more flexibility as compared to other biological input. To address this question, children (6-12 years; 32 female, 37 male; 7 Hispanic or Latino, 62 not Hispanic or Latino; 8 Black or African American, 14 multiracial, 46 White, 1 selected "other") categorized faces morphed from calm to upset and animals morphed from a horse to a cow across task phases that differed in the distribution of stimuli presented. Learners flexibly adjusted both emotion and animal category boundaries according to distributional information, yet children showed more flexibility when updating their category boundaries for emotions. These results provide support for the idea that children-who must adjust to the vast and varied emotional signals of their social partners-respond to social signals dynamically in order to make predictions about the internal states and future behaviors of others.

Indexed as

Category flexibilityEmotional developmentEmotion categorizationUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38156248
PMCPMC10751277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.