Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156247›Full record

ArticleAffective science2023

The Neural Separability of Emotion Reactivity and Regulation.

Jin-Xiao Zhang, Matt L Dixon, Philippe R Goldin, David Spiegel, James J Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jin-Xiao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-1505
Matt L DixonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Philippe R GoldinBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Davis, CA USA.
David SpiegelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.

Funding

Impact of Affect Reactivity and Regulation on Breast Cancer Treatment DecisionsU01CA197282 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, SPIEGEL, DAVID · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
fMRI of Emotion Regulation During RCT of CBT vs. MBSR for Social Anxiety DisorderR01MH092416 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA197282NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One foundational distinction in affective science is between emotion reactivity and regulation. This conceptual distinction has long been assumed to be instantiated in spatially separable brain systems (a typical example: amygdala/insula for reactivity and frontoparietal areas for regulation). In this research, we begin by reviewing previous findings that support and contradict the neural separability hypothesis concerning emotional reactivity and regulation. Further, we conduct a direct test of this hypothesis with empirical data. In five studies involving healthy and clinical samples (total Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-023-00227-9.

Indexed as

AmygdalaEmotion reactivityEmotion regulationfMRIFrontoparietalNeural separability

Identifiers

PMID38156247
PMCPMC10751283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.