ArticleCureus2023
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Infiltrations in the Ignace Deen University Hospital Center in Conakry.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Corticosteroid infiltration is a medical procedure which consists of the injection of a corticosteroid locally, into a painful site. Thus the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of corticosteroid infiltrations in the rheumatology department of the Ignace Deen University Hospital in Conakry (Guinea). Patients and method This was a prospective descriptive and analytical survey that lasted one year from July 2021 to July 2022 carried out in the rheumatology department of the Ignace Deen University Hospital in Conakry. We included all patients who had received corticosteroid infiltration. The infiltration was carried out by a rheumatologist either by anatomical or ultrasound-guided identification. Results During the study period, we recorded 1452 observations including 508 (35%) cases of corticosteroid infiltration. The average age was 53.7 years +/- 12.7 years with the majority of our patients were young adults (68%). Females predominated (55%), with a sex ratio (M/F) of 0.80. The infiltrations were mainly indicated for osteoarthritis, particularly knee osteoarthritis in 264 (52%) of cases and lumbarthrosis in 204 (40.2%) of cases, followed by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 216 (42.5%) of cases, gout in 183 (36%) of cases and lumbosciatica in 118 (23.2%) of cases. Dexamethasone was the corticosteroid predominantly used in 46.2% of cases. The associated medications were lidocaine in 93% of cases. The intensity of pain remained unchanged in 152 (30%) patients despite the infiltration sessions. Conclusion In our study, the majority of patients who benefited from cortisone infiltration were young adults, with females predominating. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis were the main indications for infiltration, and dexamethasone was the most commonly used corticosteroid. The study demonstrated the efficacy of cortisone infiltration, with improvement in pain intensity in some patients (70% of cases). For others, however, the pain remained unchanged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.