ArticleCureus2023
Elevated Troponin I as a Marker for Unfavorable Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Biomarkers in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Clinical Applications and Emerging Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Remnant cholesterol inflammatory index, calculated from residual cholesterol to C-reactive protein ratio, and stroke outcomes: a retrospective study using the National institutes of health stroke scale and modified Rankin scale.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Sympathetic overactivation and catecholamine toxicity: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for neurogenic heart injury following acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Early Cardiac Evaluation, Abnormal Test Results, and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Acute Brain Injury Admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess if elevated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) serves as a sign of unfavorable functional outcomes in ischemic stroke.
methodsIn this single-center prospective cohort study, 100 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (normal troponin I group n = 52, raised troponin I group n = 48) were included. Hospital mortality was documented in both groups; the remaining patients were followed up to 90 days. Then two groups were compared in terms of unfavorable short-term outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale > 3) and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to determine the predictive value of elevated cTnI. The Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn and compared to determine the difference in survival between the two groups. To find out the most probable cut-off level for an unfavorable outcome, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted.
resultA higher frequency of coronary artery disease (p=0.030), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (p=0.008) score, and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p=0.002) was observed in raised troponin I group. Even after the exclusion of confounding elevated troponin I was found to be an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, OR 8.25 {95% confidence interval, CI: 2.65-25.75}; p<0.001). The patients with raised troponin I had a significantly lower rate of survival after 90 days (p=0.022). The elevated troponin I was observed to have a significantly high accuracy (p<0.001; area under curve, AUC: 0.768 {moderate accuracy}, 95% CI: 0 .676 to 0.861) in predicting unfavorable outcomes.
conclusionElevated cTnI is independently associated with unfavorable short-term outcomes. It is also associated with a lower rate of survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.