Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156148›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Trocar Entry Site Hernias in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Medeni Şermet

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Medeni ŞermetGeneral Surgery, İstanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Istanbul Medeniyet University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction There is insufficient data regarding trocar access site hernias (TSH) in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This retrospective study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for hernia development in patients who did not undergo fascia repair at trocar entry sites. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 284 patients with morbid obesity who underwent LSG between January 2016 and December 2021. The fascia of the trocar entry site was not closed in any of the patients. Weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), comorbidities, and the occurrence of complications were recorded at one, six, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Ultrasonography (USG) was performed and supplemented with computed tomography (CT) when necessary. Results All patients underwent a 24-month follow-up, during which four patients developed trocar site hernias, resulting in an overall prevalence of 1.4%. Of the total hernias, two occurred within the first 30 days. A single patient required surgical intervention for an incarcerated hernia on the 18th day. Before undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), the mean weight and body mass index (BMI) of the participants were 124.2 ± 16.7 kg and 43.4 ± 5.7 kg/m², respectively. After one year, the participants experienced a mean percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) of 77.1 ± 12.2% and a mean total weight loss (TWL) of 33.2 ± 6.2%. Hernia formation has been found to be associated with both type 2 diabetes (T2D) and female gender. Conclusion In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), repair of the trocar port closure is not always necessary. The rates of hernia at port entry sites were similar between cases with and without fascial repair.

Indexed as

bariatricgastric sleeveherniatrocar site herniaunrepaired fascia

Identifiers

PMID38156148
PMCPMC10753265
OpenAlexW4389098037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.