ArticleCureus2023
Knowledge and Attitudes Toward E-cigarette Use: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low income and health literacy: a systematic scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Pooled it
- Misconceptions About E-cigarettes Among Healthcare Workers at Primary Health Care Centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In light of the fact that electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is a newly emerging behavior in the Middle Eastern region, where tobacco consumption is widespread, it is imperative to examine the present state of e-cigarette awareness and attitudes toward e-cigarettes. The aim of this research is to investigate the level of knowledge and attitudes pertaining to the utilization of e-cigarettes within the context of Saudi Arabia. Methodology A cross-sectional online survey study was conducted between May and September 2023 to assess public knowledge and attitudes toward e-cigarettes in Saudi Arabia. This study utilized a previously validated questionnaire to assess the knowledge and attitudes of participants regarding e-cigarettes. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of being knowledgeable of and having a positive attitude toward e-cigarettes. Results A total of 422 participants were involved in this study. Around one-third of the study participants were current smokers (37.2%). The median knowledge score for the study participants was 13.00 (11.00-14.00), which reflects a high level of e-cigarette knowledge. The median knowledge score for the study participants ranged between 3.00 and 15.00. The median attitude score for the study participants was 3.00 (1.00-5.00), which reflects a negative attitude toward the use of e-cigarettes. The median attitude score for the study participants ranged between 0.00 and 12.00. Participants with a monthly income of 5,001 SAR and above were more likely to be knowledgeable about e-cigarette use (p < 0.05). However, binary logistic regression analysis did not identify any statistically significant predictor of positive attitude toward the use of e-cigarettes (p > 0.05). Conclusions The study population exhibited a significant level of knowledge regarding e-cigarettes, which was coupled with a prevailing negative attitude toward their use. The income level of individuals emerged as a significant predictor of e-cigarette knowledge. To obtain a comprehensive knowledge of the factors that contribute to negative attitudes toward e-cigarette usage, particularly among specific demographic groups, it is imperative to employ a qualitative research methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.