Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156063›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2023

An exploration of knowledge-organizing technologies to advance transdisciplinary back pain research.

Jeffrey C Lotz, Glen Ropella, Paul Anderson, Qian Yang, Michael A Hedderich, Jeannie Bailey, C Anthony Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeffrey C LotzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California at San Francisco San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-0647
Glen RopellaTempus Dictum, Inc Milwaukie Oregon USA.
Paul AndersonDepartment of Computer Science & Software Engineering California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo California USA.
Qian YangDepartment of Information Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Michael A HedderichDepartment of Information Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Jeannie BaileyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of California at San Francisco San Francisco California USA.
C Anthony HuntDepartment of Bioengineering & Therapeutic Sciences University of California at San Francisco San Francisco California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-6860

Funding

UCSF Core Center for Patient-centric Mechanistic Phenotyping in Chronic Low Back PainU19AR076737 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LOTZ, JEFFREY C. · 2019 to 2023
$34.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS U19 AR076737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is influenced by a broad spectrum of patient-specific factors as codified in domains of the biopsychosocial model (BSM). Operationalizing the BSM into research and clinical care is challenging because most investigators work in silos that concentrate on only one or two BSM domains. Furthermore, the expanding, multidisciplinary nature of BSM research creates practical limitations as to how individual investigators integrate current data into their processes of generating impactful hypotheses. The rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence (AI) is providing new tools for organizing knowledge, but the practical aspects for how AI may advance LBP research and clinical are beginning to be explored. The goals of the work presented here are to: (1) explore the current capabilities of knowledge integration technologies (large language models (LLM), similarity graphs (SGs), and knowledge graphs (KGs)) to synthesize biomedical literature and depict multimodal relationships reflected in the BSM, and; (2) highlight limitations, implementation details, and future areas of research to improve performance. We demonstrate preliminary evidence that LLMs, like GPT-3, may be useful in helping scientists analyze and distinguish cLBP publications across multiple BSM domains and determine the degree to which the literature supports or contradicts emergent hypotheses. We show that SG representations and KGs enable exploring LBP's literature in novel ways, possibly providing, trans-disciplinary perspectives or insights that are currently difficult, if not infeasible to achieve. The SG approach is automated, simple, and inexpensive to execute, and thereby may be useful for early-phase literature and narrative explorations beyond one's areas of expertise. Likewise, we show that KGs can be constructed using automated pipelines, queried to provide semantic information, and analyzed to explore trans-domain linkages. The examples presented support the feasibility for LBP-tailored AI protocols to organize knowledge and support developing and refining trans-domain hypotheses.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiopsychosocial modelchronic low back painknowledge graphs

Identifiers

PMID38156063
PMCPMC10751978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.