Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38156058›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2023

Finite element modeling to predict the influence of anatomic variation and implant placement on performance of biological intervertebral disc implants.

Maho Koga, Byumsu Kim, Marianne Lintz, Sertaç Kirnaz, Jacob L Goldberg, Ibrahim Hussain, Branden Medary, Kathleen N Meyers, Suzanne A Maher, Roger Härtl and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maho KogaMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Byumsu KimSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0743-5539
Marianne LintzMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3279-2167
Sertaç KirnazWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Jacob L GoldbergWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Ibrahim HussainWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Branden MedaryWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Kathleen N MeyersHospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
Suzanne A MaherHospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
Roger HärtlWeill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Lawrence J BonassarMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Cornell University · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tissue-engineered intervertebral disc (TE-IVD) constructs are an attractive therapy for treating degenerative disc disease and have previously been investigated in vivo in both large and small animal models. The mechanical environment of the spine is notably challenging, in part due to its complex anatomy, and implants may require additional mechanical support to avoid failure in the early stages of implantation. As such, the design of suitable support implants requires rigorous validation. Methods: We created a FE model to simulate the behavior of the IVD cages under compression specific to the anatomy of the porcine cervical spine, validated the FE model using an animal model, and predicted the effects of implant location and vertebral angle of the motion segment on implant behavior. Specifically, we tested anatomical positioning of the superior vertebra and placement of the implant. We analyzed corresponding stress and strain distributions. Results: Results demonstrated that the anatomical geometry of the porcine cervical spine led to concentrated stress and strain on the posterior side of the cage. This stress concentration was associated with the location of failure of the cages reported in vivo, despite superior mechanical properties of the implant. Furthermore, placement of the cage was found to have profound effects on migration, while the angle of the superior vertebra affected stress concentration of the cage. Conclusions: This model can be utilized both to inform surgical procedures and provide insight on future cage designs and can be adopted to models without the use of in vivo animal models.

Indexed as

cervical spinefinite element analysisintervertebral disc implantlarge animal model

Identifiers

PMID38156058
PMCPMC10751973
OpenAlexW4390277320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.