Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

The comparison between fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate combined with letrozole in patients of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a propensity score-matched study.

Ying Zhang, Hao Li, Shanshan Zhu, Shengfang Jiang, Wenxian Zhao, Xiaoning Wang, Liu Tian, Guangming Zhao, Nongqiao He, Honglu Diao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying Zhang *Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Hao Li *Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Shanshan ZhuReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Shengfang JiangReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Wenxian ZhaoReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Xiaoning WangReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Liu TianReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Guangming ZhaoReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Nongqiao HeReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Honglu DiaoReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Hong CaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Changjun ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Hubei University of Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in conjunction with letrozole (LE) in infertile women by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center. Population: A total of 3173 infertile women undergoing their first Methods: A total of 1068 and 783 patients who underwent a fixed dose of MPA combined with LE and a degressive dose of MPA combined with LE protocols, respectively, were enrolled in this study. The freeze-all approach and later frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) were performed in both groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the dosage of MPA and the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the fetal malformation rate. Results: We created a perfect match of 478 patients in each group. The dosage of MPA, the LH serum level on the eighth day of stimulation, progesterone (P) level and LH level on the hCG trigger day were significantly higher in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (52.1 ± 13.1 mg vs. 44.9 ± 12.5 mg; 5.0 ± 2.7 IU/L vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 IU/L; 0.9 ± 0.5 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml; 3.3 ± 2.4 IU/L vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 IU/L; Conclusion: The combination of a degressive MPA dose with LE proved effective in reducing the total MPA dosage with comparable premature LH surge and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing the PPOS protocol.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleProgestinsFemaleHumansLetrozoleLuteinizing HormoneMaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateOvulation InductionPregnancyPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSemenLetrozoleLuteinizing HormoneMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProgestinscontrolled ovarian stimulationdose reductionletrozolemedroxyprogesterone acetateprogestin primed ovarian stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38155955
PMCPMC10754509
OpenAlexW4389614497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.