ArticleClinical image-based procedures, fairness of AI in medical imaging, and ethical and philosophical issues in medical imaging : 12th International Workshop, CLIP 2023 1st International Workshop, FAIMI 2023 and 2nd International Workshop, ...2023
Automatic Neurocranial Landmarks Detection from Visible Facial Landmarks Leveraging 3D Head Priors.
Article in Clinical image-based procedures, fairness of AI in medical imaging, and ethical and philosophical issues in medical imaging : 12th International Workshop, CLIP 2023 1st International Workshop, FAIMI 2023 and 2nd International Workshop, ..., 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scalp surface estimation and head registration using sparse sampling and 3D statistical models.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The localization and tracking of neurocranial landmarks is essential in modern medical procedures, e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, state-of-the-art treatments still rely on the manual identification of head targets and require setting retroreflective markers for tracking. This limits the applicability and scalability of TMS approaches, making them time-consuming, dependent on expensive hardware, and prone to errors when retroreflective markers drift from their initial position. To overcome these limitations, we propose a scalable method capable of inferring the position of points of interest on the scalp, e.g., the International 10-20 System's neurocranial landmarks. In contrast with existing approaches, our method does not require human intervention or markers; head landmarks are estimated leveraging visible facial landmarks, optional head size measurements, and statistical head model priors. We validate the proposed approach on ground truth data from 1,150 subjects, for which facial 3D and head information is available; our technique achieves a localization RMSE of 2.56 mm on average, which is of the same order as reported by high-end techniques in TMS. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/odedsc/ANLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.