Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155772›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Implications of uncertainty in technology cost projections for least-cost decarbonized electricity systems.

Lei Duan, Ken Caldeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lei DuanDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ken CaldeiraDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plans for decarbonized electricity systems rely on projections of highly uncertain future technology costs. We use a stylized model to investigate the influence of future cost uncertainty, as represented by different projections in the National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2021 Annual Technology Baseline dataset, on technology mixes comprising least-cost decarbonized electricity systems. Our analysis shows that given the level of future cost uncertainty as represented by these projections, it is not possible to predict with confidence which technologies will play a dominant role in future least-cost carbon emission-free energy systems. Successful efforts to reduce costs of individual technologies may or may not lead to system cost reductions and widespread deployments, depending on the success of cost-reduction efforts for competing and complementary technologies. These results suggest a portfolio approach to reducing technology costs. Reliance on uncertain cost breakthroughs risks costly outcomes. Iterative decision-making with learning can help mitigate these risks.

Indexed as

Applied sciencesEnergy managementEnergy Modelling

Identifiers

PMID38155772
PMCPMC10753084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.