Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155731›Full record

ReviewGeoHealth2023

Water, Water Everywhere, but Every Drop Unique: Challenges in the Science to Understand the Role of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Management of Drinking Water Supplies.

Susan T Glassmeyer, Emily E Burns, Michael J Focazio, Edward T Furlong, Matthew O Gribble, Michael A Jahne, Scott P Keely, Alison R Kennicutt, Dana W Kolpin, Elizabeth K Medlock Kakaley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The State-of-the-Art ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Susan T GlassmeyerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Cincinnati OH USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0538-5793
Emily E BurnsPersonal Care Products Council Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-6409
Michael J FocazioRetired, Environmental Health Program Ecosystems Mission Area U.S. Geological Survey Reston VA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-5576
Edward T FurlongEmeritus, Strategic Laboratory Sciences Branch Laboratory & Analytical Services Division U.S. Geological Survey Denver CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7305-4603
Matthew O GribbleGangarosa Department of Environmental Health Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-2981
Michael A JahneU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Cincinnati OH USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-9859
Scott P KeelyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Cincinnati OH USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5343-3649
Alison R KennicuttDepartment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering York College of Pennsylvania York PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-356X
Dana W KolpinU.S. Geological Survey Central Midwest Water Science Center Iowa City IA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-6505
Elizabeth K Medlock KakaleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park NC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-9262
Stacy L PfallerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Cincinnati OH USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USUnited States Geological Survey · USEdgewell Personal Care (United States) · USEmory University · USYork College of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protection and management of water resources continues to be challenged by multiple and ongoing factors such as shifts in demographic, social, economic, and public health requirements. Physical limitations placed on access to potable supplies include natural and human-caused factors such as aquifer depletion, aging infrastructure, saltwater intrusion, floods, and drought. These factors, although varying in magnitude, spatial extent, and timing, can exacerbate the potential for contaminants of concern (CECs) to be present in sources of drinking water, infrastructure, premise plumbing and associated tap water. This monograph examines how current and emerging scientific efforts and technologies increase our understanding of the range of CECs and drinking water issues facing current and future populations. It is not intended to be read in one sitting, but is instead a starting point for scientists wanting to learn more about the issues surrounding CECs. This text discusses the topical evolution CECs over time (Section 1), improvements in measuring chemical and microbial CECs, through both analysis of concentration and toxicity (Section 2) and modeling CEC exposure and fate (Section 3), forms of treatment effective at removing chemical and microbial CECs (Section 4), and potential for human health impacts from exposure to CECs (Section 5). The paper concludes with how changes to water quantity, both scarcity and surpluses, could affect water quality (Section 6). Taken together, these sections document the past 25 years of CEC research and the regulatory response to these contaminants, the current work to identify and monitor CECs and mitigate exposure, and the challenges facing the future.

Indexed as

aquatic life healthcontaminants of emerging concernhuman healthwater

Identifiers

PMID38155731
PMCPMC10753268
OpenAlexW4390350543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.