Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155703›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023

Development of hydrogel-based standards and phantoms for non-linear imaging at depth.

Fizza Haseeb, Konstantinos N Bourdakos, Ewan Forsyth, Kerry Setchfield, Alistair Gorman, Seshasailam Venkateswaran, Amanda J Wright, Sumeet Mahajan, Mark Bradley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fizza HaseebUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Chemistry, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-4471
Konstantinos N BourdakosUniversity of Southampton, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ewan ForsythUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Chemistry, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Kerry SetchfieldUniversity of Nottingham, Faculty of Engineering, Optics and Photonics Research Group, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-8494
Alistair GormanUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Engineering, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Seshasailam VenkateswaranUniversity of Southampton, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Amanda J WrightUniversity of Nottingham, Faculty of Engineering, Optics and Photonics Research Group, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sumeet MahajanUniversity of Southampton, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-6666
Mark BradleyQueen Mary University of London, Precision Healthcare University Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7893-1575
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Rapid advances in medical imaging technology, particularly the development of optical systems with non-linear imaging modalities, are boosting deep tissue imaging. The development of reliable standards and phantoms is critical for validation and optimization of these cutting-edge imaging techniques. Aim: We aim to design and fabricate flexible, multi-layered hydrogel-based optical standards and evaluate advanced optical imaging techniques at depth. Approach: Standards were made using a robust double-network hydrogel matrix consisting of agarose and polyacrylamide. The materials generated ranged from single layers to more complex constructs consisting of up to seven layers, with modality-specific markers embedded between the layers. Results: These standards proved useful in the determination of the axial scaling factor for light microscopy and allowed for depth evaluation for different imaging modalities (conventional one-photon excitation fluorescence imaging, two-photon excitation fluorescence imaging, second harmonic generation imaging, and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering) achieving actual depths of 1550, 1550, 1240, and Conclusions: The ability to image at depth, the phantom's robustness and flexible layered structure, and the ready incorporation of "optical markers" make these ideal depth standards for the validation of a variety of imaging modalities.

Indexed as

HydrogelsOptical DevicesMicroscopyOptical ImagingPhantoms, ImagingHydrogelsaxial scalingdepth imaginghydrogelnon-linear imagingphantomsstandards

Identifiers

PMID38155703
PMCPMC10753126
OpenAlexW4390348359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.