ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Intermediate-term outcome of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory glaucoma.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering from baseline levels, the number antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) in the postoperative phase, and the rate of complications.
methodsIt was a retrospective interventional case series. All patients who underwent AADI surgeries with sulcus fixation from March 2018 to September 2018 at a tertiary eye care hospital in North India with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were recruited for the study. A standard AADI technique was employed. The primary outcome measures were the postoperative IOP, the requirement of AGMs, and early and late postoperative complications.
resultsA total of 20 patients were recruited in the study. The mean follow-up period was 25.25 ± 3.76 months. The mean IOP reduced from 33.20 ± 7.95 mmHg to 19.45 ± 9.19 mmHg at day 1, 13.62 ± 3.92 mmHg at 6 months, 12.78 ± 3.36 mmHg at 1 year, and 13.0 ± 2.53 mmHg at 2 years postoperatively (
conclusionThe study assessed the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and long-term AGM requirement with AADI and found it to be a good viable surgical option in refractory glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.