ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Parental experience with an ocular genetic counseling services in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital glaucoma prevention program-Evaluation of patient knowledge and acceptance of genetic screening.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Prevention and early intervention screening for inherited ocular diseases in Saudi Arabia: a national perspective.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study reports parental attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and their satisfaction with genetic counseling services offered by a territory eye care hospital in Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 30 parents (either father or mother) of children affected by recessive genetic ocular disorders. Their basic knowledge of recessive genetic disorders, attitude toward PGD, and satisfaction with counseling services were assessed using structured telephonic interviews.
resultsEighty percent of the participants understood the concept of recessive inheritance patterns and the effect of consanguineous marriages on raising the likelihood of giving birth to a child with genetic disorders. Forty-seven percent of parents understood the risk of having an affected future offspring. Sixty-seven percent of them mentioned that they would consider using preventive measures when conceiving next time. Seventy-three percent of participants stated that they would share the genetic test results with family members. Ninety percent of the parents were satisfied with the genetic counselor's ability to listen to them and the way the counselor explained the genetic information. There was a statistically significant association between parental willingness to share genetic test results with relatives and being given the opportunity to share information with their genetic counselor (
conclusionMost parents had a basic understanding of recessive disease. However, they often struggled to comprehend the science and mathematical probabilities determining the recurrence risk in future pregnancies. This complexity makes it difficult for them to recall the information. Attitude toward PGD did not seem to be related with parent knowledge. A significant proportion of the parents expressed willingness to share their genetic test results with relatives, but some were hesitant due to fears of stigma. Most parents were satisfied with genetic counseling services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.