ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2023
Current status of and future issues related to endoscopic papillectomy.
Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life and outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomyWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Gangliocytic Paraganglioma: A Case Series and Literature Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Review
- A case of pancreatic fistula with disruption of the inferior branch of the pancreatic duct caused by a pancreatic stent after endoscopic papillectomy.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic papillectomy is widely performed to treat duodenal papillary tumors, particularly at high-volume centers. It is indicated for adenomas without intraductal extension of the bile or pancreatic ducts. However, despite numerous reports of carcinomas that expand the indications to include well-differentiated adenocarcinomas that do not invade the sphincter of Oddi, the low agreement between biopsy and final pathological diagnosis, as well as the current inability of imaging modalities to diagnose sphincter of Oddi invasion, makes it difficult to consider expanding indications. Although complications can be prevented by certain methods, such as pancreatic duct stenting, and the frequency of severe complications has decreased, the safety of the procedure remains unconfirmed. In the future, this technology is expected to progress and enable wider applications, including those in tumors with extensive horizontal spread and those with intraductal extension of the bile and pancreatic ducts. Such technology may also improve the safety and accuracy of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.