ArticleThoracic cancer2024
Comparison of primary and metastatic site-related PD-L1 expression in predicting ORR in patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICB-based therapy.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether the value of PD-L1 expression from metastatic sites to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based treatment is equivalent to that from a primary tumor is uncertain. This study aimed to compare the utility of PD-L1 TPS from a primary lung tumor and metastatic sites to predict the overall response rate (ORR) of first-line ICB-based treatment.
methodsThis study included 249 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received first-line ICB-based treatment. All subjects underwent PD-L1 testing prior to ICB-based treatment and were divided into two cohorts corresponding to the different biopsy sites: lung primary site-sampled cohort (PT cohort, n = 167) and metastatic site-sampled cohort (MT cohort, n = 82).
resultsThere was no statistical significance in PD-L1 TPS distribution between the two cohorts (p = 0.742). PD-L1 TPS ≥50% was also related to high ORR compared with PD-L1 < 50% in the PT cohort (34.3% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.004). In contrast, ICB-based therapy could bring comparable ORR (35.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.871) in the MT cohort regardless of PD-L1 TPS status (≥50%, or <50%). As supported, when the cutoff value of TPS was selected as 50%, it was suggested that PT-related PD-L1 was the independent predictor of ORR (OR 2.870, 95% CI: 1.231-6.694, p = 0.015) rather than MT-related PD-L1 (OR 0.689, 95% CI: 0.236-2.013, p = 0.495). Furthermore, ROC proved that PT-related PD-L1 expression manifested a better AUC of 0.621 (p = 0.026) than that of MT-related PD-L1 (AUC = 0.565, p = 0.362).
conclusionCompared with PT-related PD-L1 expression, MT-related PD-L1 expression showed limited value in predicting ORR in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICB-based therapy. It was concluded that even patients with low MT-related PD-L1 expression could benefit from ICB-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.