Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155417›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2024

Comparative efficacy of silver alginate dressings versus standard gauze in enhancing wound healing post-mastectomy for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kejiao Qiang, Hong Jiang, Yuanyuan Xing, Xin Liang, Yangfei Luo, Xiao Wu

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kejiao QiangNursing Department, The First People's Hospital of Nanyang City, Nanyang, China.
Hong JiangSurgical Department, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China.
Yuanyuan XingNuclear Medicine Department, Shenzhen Sun Yat Sen University Affiliated Seventh Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xin LiangNursing Department, The First People's Hospital of Nanyang City, Nanyang, China.
Yangfei LuoMedicine Department, Yangtze University College of Arts and Sciences, Jingzhou, China.
Xiao WuGeneral Surgery Department, Liyuan Hospital Affiliated To Tongji Medical College Huazhong University Of Science And Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNanyang Institute of Technology · CNThe Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture · CNThe First People's Hospital of Guiyang · CNThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of silver alginate dressings (SAD) compared to standard gauze (SG) in enhancing wound healing and reducing scar formation post-mastectomy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. From an initial pool of 1245 articles, five studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that SAD significantly improve early wound healing 1 week post-mastectomy, as indicated by lower Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, and Approximation (REEDA) scales (I

Indexed as

BurnsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAlginatesBandagesCicatrixHumansMastectomySilverWound HealingAlginatesSilvermeta‐analysispost‐mastectomy wound healingscar formationsilver alginate dressingstriple‐negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38155417
PMCPMC10961884
OpenAlexW4390409505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.