Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155396›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2024

Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm of pancreas in pregnancy: A case report and review of literature.

R K Hanumantha Naik, Anbalagan Amudhan, ArunKumar Ashokkumar, Anbarasu Inbasekaran, Selvaraj Thangasamy, Jeswanth Sathyanesan

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R K Hanumantha NaikInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8318-0294
Anbalagan AmudhanInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-1336
ArunKumar AshokkumarInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7554-3327
Anbarasu InbasekaranInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5600-4635
Selvaraj ThangasamyInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-4355
Jeswanth SathyanesanInstitute of Surgical Gastroenterology & Liver Transplant, Centre for GI Bleed, Division HPB Diseases, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-8153
Stanley Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN) of the pancreas is an uncommon tumor that accounts for approximately 1%-2% of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. It predominantly affects female in their second and third decades of life. In this case report, we present a clinical scenario of a 21-year-old pregnant woman who incidentally discovered a solid cystic lesion in her pancreas, exhibiting features suggestive of SPEN. The patient underwent surgery during the second trimester. Management of pregnant females with SPEN poses challenges due to the absence of definitive treatment guidelines, particularly in determining the ideal timing for surgical intervention. Notably, during pregnancy, the presence of a small SPEN does not necessarily require immediate resection. However, if the tumor is of significant size, it can give rise to complications such as tumor rupture, multivisceral resection, recurrence, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine growth restriction, or premature delivery if not addressed. In the existing literature, a common finding is that approximately two-thirds of pregnant females with SPEN underwent surgery in the second trimester, often without complications for the mother or fetus. All these tumors were larger than 8 cm. The decision to operate before or after birth can be individualized based on team discussion. However, delay in surgery may lead to larger tumors and higher risks like bleeding, rupture, multivisceral resection, and recurrence. Therefore, second-trimester surgery seems safer, and lessens dangers, emergency surgery, and tumor recurrence.

Indexed as

Distal pancreatectomyPancreatic neoplasmsPregnancySplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID38155396
PMCPMC10896691
OpenAlexW4390409871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.