Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155223›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Handheld ultrasound-assisted versus palpation-guided combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Jinyoung Bae, Youngwon Kim, Seokha Yoo, Jin-Tae Kim, Sun-Kyung Park

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04759547 nacompletednot on this map

Handheld Ultrasound-assisted Versus Palpation-guided Labor Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsLabor AnalgesiaArmshandheld ultrasound-assisted technique, conventional palpation-guided technique
NCT07669441 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Early Preprocedural Ultrasound Versus Landmark Palpation for Site Identification in Labour Epidural Analgesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City (UMC)Ran2026 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsLabor Pain, Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery, Neuraxial UltrasoundArmsPreprocedural Spinal Ultrasound, Conventional Landmark Palpation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinyoung BaeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Youngwon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seokha YooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Tae KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Kyung ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mayskpark@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprocedural ultrasound assistance can enhance the efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics. We investigated whether the use of handheld ultrasound can shorten the procedural time of labor combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia compared with conventional landmark-guided methods. Eighty-four women requesting labor analgesia were randomly assigned to either handheld ultrasound-assisted or palpation-guided CSE analgesia. Primary outcome was procedure time of the CSE analgesia. Secondary outcomes included identification time, performance time, number of needle manipulations required for epidural/spinal success, first-attempt success rate, periprocedural pain scores, the incidence of accidental dural puncture, and patient satisfaction. Total procedure time did not significantly differ between the ultrasound and palpation groups (median [IQR], 191.5 [167-224] vs. 204.5 [163-358] s; P = 0.442). However, the performance time was significantly shorter in the ultrasound group (134.5 [115-177] vs. 183 [129-296] s; P = 0.011), although identification time was longer in the ultrasound group (53 [41-72] vs. 30.5 [21-45] s; P < 0.001). The epidural success rate at first insertion attempt was higher in the ultrasound group (85.7% vs. 59.5%, P = 0.014). Preprocedural handheld ultrasound assistance resulted in equivalent total procedure times but reduced performance times and higher first-attempt success rates. Therefore, clinicians may consider this technique for labor CSE analgesia.Trial registration: NCT04759547.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, SpinalFemaleHumansPalpationPregnancySpinal PunctureUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID38155223
PMCPMC10754906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.