ArticleScientific reports2023
A rapid and reference-free imputation method for low-cost genotyping platforms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Chimeric reference panels for genomic imputation.Genetics · 2026Article
- STICI: Split-Transformer with integrated convolutions for genotype imputation.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most current genotype imputation methods are reference-based, which posed several challenges to users, such as high computational costs and reference panel inaccessibility. Thus, deep learning models are expected to create reference-free imputation methods performing with higher accuracy and shortening the running time. We proposed a imputation method using recurrent neural networks integrating with an additional discriminator network, namely GRUD. This method was applied to datasets from genotyping chips and Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing (LP-WGS) with the reference panels from The 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) phase 3, the dataset of 4810 Singaporeans (SG10K), and The 1000 Vietnamese Genome Project (VN1K). Our model performed more accurately than other existing methods on multiple datasets, especially with common variants with large minor allele frequency, and shrank running time and memory usage. In summary, these results indicated that GRUD can be implemented in genomic analyses to improve the accuracy and running-time of genotype imputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.