Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38155182›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Utilizing a novel high-resolution malaria dataset for climate-informed predictions with a deep learning transformer model.

Micheal T Pillay, Noboru Minakawa, Yoonhee Kim, Nyakallo Kgalane, Jayanthi V Ratnam, Swadhin K Behera, Masahiro Hashizume, Neville Sweijd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Micheal T PillayDepartment of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Nagasaki University, 1-12-4, Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, 852-8523, Japan. michaelteron@gmail.com.
Noboru MinakawaDepartment of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN), Nagasaki University, 1-12-4, Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, 852-8523, Japan.
Yoonhee KimDepartment of Global Environmental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo: The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo Ward, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
Nyakallo KgalaneLimpopo Department of Health, Malaria Control: 18 College Street, Polokwane, 0700, South Africa.
Jayanthi V RatnamApplication Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 3173-25, Showa-Machi, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama-City, Kanagawa, 236-0001, Japan.
Swadhin K BeheraApplication Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), 3173-25, Showa-Machi, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama-City, Kanagawa, 236-0001, Japan.
Masahiro HashizumeGraduate School of Medicine Department of Global Health Policy, The University of Tokyo: The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo Ward, Tokyo, 113-8654, Japan.
Neville SweijdAlliance for Collaboration on Climate & Earth Systems Science (ACCESS), CSIR, Lower Hope Road, Rosebank, 770, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climatic factors influence malaria transmission via the effect on the Anopheles vector and Plasmodium parasite. Modelling and understanding the complex effects that climate has on malaria incidence can enable important early warning capabilities. Deep learning applications across fields are proving valuable, however the field of epidemiological forecasting is still in its infancy with a lack of applied deep learning studies for malaria in southern Africa which leverage quality datasets. Using a novel high resolution malaria incidence dataset containing 23 years of daily data from 1998 to 2021, a statistical model and XGBOOST machine learning model were compared to a deep learning Transformer model by assessing the accuracy of their numerical predictions. A novel loss function, used to account for the variable nature of the data yielded performance around + 20% compared to the standard MSE loss. When numerical predictions were converted to alert thresholds to mimic use in a real-world setting, the Transformer's performance of 80% according to AUROC was 20-40% higher than the statistical and XGBOOST models and it had the highest overall accuracy of 98%. The Transformer performed consistently with increased accuracy as more climate variables were used, indicating further potential for this prediction framework to predict malaria incidence at a daily level using climate data for southern Africa.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMalariaAnimalsClimateModels, StatisticalMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID38155182
PMCPMC10754862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.