Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38154937›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Providing care to marginalised communities: a qualitative study of community pharmacy teams.

Helen Gibson, Caroline Sanders, Thomas Blakeman, Darren M Ashcroft, Nina Fudge, Kelly Howells

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementing and Delivering Culturally Centred Pharmacy Services Tailored to Ethnically Minoritised Populations: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen GibsonNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6795-2749
Caroline SandersNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-928X
Thomas BlakemanNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3298-8423
Darren M AshcroftNIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester; Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-915X
Nina FudgeWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-4355
Kelly HowellsNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7281-2492
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth inequalities in the UK are widening, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Community pharmacies are the most visited healthcare provider in England and are ideally placed to provide and facilitate access to care for those most disadvantaged.

aimTo explore the experiences and needs of community pharmacy teams in providing care for marginalised groups and how this has changed since the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study in community pharmacy and across primary care.

methodSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with members of community pharmacy teams, primary care network (PCN) pharmacists, GPs, and nurses in the North of England.

resultsIn total, 31 individuals participated in an interview (26 pharmacy staff, three GPs, and two nurses). Most participants acknowledged that their pharmacy had become busier since COVID-19 because of increased footfall compounded by patient difficulties in navigating remote digital systems. Few participants had received any formal training on working with marginalised communities; however, organisational barriers (such as lack of access to translation facilities) combined with interorganisational barriers (such as lack of integrated care) made it more difficult to provide care for some marginalised groups. Despite this, the continuity of care provided by many pharmacies was viewed as an important factor in enabling marginalised groups to access and receive care.

conclusionThere are opportunities to better utilise the skills of community pharmacy teams. Resources, such as access to translation services, and interventions to enable better communication between community pharmacy teams and other primary care services, such as general practice, are essential.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesCOVID-19PharmaciesHumansPandemicsPharmacistscommunity pharmacy serviceshealthcare inequalitiesmedically underserved populationsprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID38154937
PMCPMC10755997
OpenAlexW4387498185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.