Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38154810›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

The role of social media in public health crises caused by infectious disease: a scoping review.

Kirsty Terry, Fei Yang, Qiang Yao, Chaojie Liu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PH-LLM: Public Health Large Language Models for Infoveillance.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. One Health policy for combatting African trypanocide resistance.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsty TerrySchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University - Bundoora Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-4116-655X
Fei YangSchool of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiang YaoSchool of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China c.liu@latrobe.edu.au yaoqiang@whu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4408-087X
Chaojie LiuSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University - Bundoora Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia c.liu@latrobe.edu.au yaoqiang@whu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-0424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe onset of the COVID-19 global pandemic highlighted the increasing role played by social media in the generation, dissemination and consumption of outbreak-related information.

objectiveThe objective of the current review is to identify and summarise the role of social media in public health crises caused by infectious disease, using a five-step scoping review protocol. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Keyword lists for two categories were generated: social media and public health crisis. By combining these keywords, an advanced search of various relevant databases was performed to identify all articles of interest from 2000 to 2021, with an initial retrieval date of 13 December 2021. A total of six medical and health science, psychology, social science and communication databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO and CNKI. A three-stage screening process against inclusion and exclusion criteria was conducted.

findingsA total of 338 studies were identified for data extraction, with the earliest study published in 2010. Thematic analysis of the role of social media revealed three broad themes: surveillance monitoring, risk communication and disease control. Within these themes, 12 subthemes were also identified. Within surveillance monitoring, the subthemes were disease detection and prediction, public attitude and attention, public sentiment and mental health. Within risk communication, the subthemes were health advice, information-seeking behaviour, infodemics/misinformation circulation, seeking help online, online distance education and telehealth. Finally, within disease control, the subthemes were government response, public behaviour change and health education information quality. It was clear that the pace of research in this area has gradually increased over time as social media has evolved, with an explosion in attention following the outbreak of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Social media has become a hugely powerful force in public health and cannot be ignored or viewed as a minor consideration when developing public health policy. Limitations of the study are discussed, along with implications for government, health authorities and individual users. The pressing need for government and health authorities to formalise evidence-based strategies for communicating via social media is highlighted, as well as issues for individual users in assessing the quality and reliability of information consumed on social media platforms.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Social MediaHumansPublic HealthReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2EpidemiologyHealth policyPublic HealthReview

Identifiers

PMID38154810
PMCPMC10759087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.