Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2024
Surgical transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine at cesarean: a pilot randomized trial.
Trial report in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of liposomal bupivacaine and regular bupivacaine in the transversus abdominis plane for postoperative analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of liposome bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Recovery in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Liposomal Bupivacaine in Perioperative Analgesia: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Context.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Advances of regional nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: precision, innovation, and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evolving Trends and Core Contributors: A Bibliometric Update on Liposomal Bupivacaine.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Biochemical strategies for opioid-sparing pain management in the operating room.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Epidural analgesia combined with transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine reduces pain after caesarean delivery: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostcesarean pain control is challenging. In addition to intrathecal morphine, recent studies have shown that liposomal bupivacaine administered via conventional transversus abdominis plane block reduces postcesarean opioid use. However, whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via a surgical approach also reduces opioid use is unknown.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) reduces the cumulative dose of opioids administered in the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery among participants who also receive intrathecal morphine. STUDY
designThis was a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial of 60 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at a community tertiary referral hospital staffed by academic physicians. Immediately before fascial closure during cesarean delivery, a total of 80 mL of dilute bupivacaine plus liposomal bupivacaine or dilute bupivacaine alone was administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (40 mL on each side). The primary outcome was a median cumulative opioid dose received within the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery measured in morphine milligram equivalents. In addition, opioid use at other time points, pain scores, and participant satisfaction were assessed. A sample size of 60 was determined to be adequate to inform a potential future adequately powered randomized trial. The primary outcome of morphine milligram equivalents and pain scores were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
resultsBetween October 11, 2021, and August 29, 2022, 60 participants were randomized and analyzed: 31 were allocated to liposomal bupivacaine plus regular bupivacaine (intervention group), and 29 were allocated to regular bupivacaine alone (control group). Participants allocated to the intervention group used a median cumulative dose of 2 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids (interquartile range, 0-24) in the first 48 hours compared with 8 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range, 0-40) among participants allocated to the control group (P=.236). The percentage of participants who used ≤15 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids was 61% in the intervention arm and 41% in the control arm (P=.123), and the percentage who used zero opioids was 45% in the intervention arm and 34% in the control arm (P=.399). The total number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge was fewer in the intervention arm than in the control arm (P=.029). Patient satisfaction with the intervention group and control group was similar.
conclusionOur pilot study suggests that liposomal bupivacaine administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block is worth critical evaluation as an adjunctive analgesic modality in an adequately powered randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.