Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38154514›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2024

Prevalence and Therapeutic Targeting of High-Level ERBB2 Amplification in NSCLC.

Igor Odintsov, Maisam Makarem, Mizuki Nishino, Sara Emily Bachert, Tom Zhang, Jaclyn LoPiccolo, Cloud P Paweletz, Prafulla C Gokhale, Elena Ivanova, Aisha Saldanha and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Igor OdintsovDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maisam MakaremLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mizuki NishinoDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sara Emily BachertDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Tom ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.
Jaclyn LoPiccoloLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cloud P PaweletzLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Prafulla C GokhaleLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elena IvanovaLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aisha SaldanhaLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Charles M RudinDepartment of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
William W LockwoodDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marc LadanyiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Romel SomwarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pasi A JänneLowe Center for Thoracic Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lynette M ShollDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: lmsholl@bwh.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Role of Focal Oncogene Amplifications in Lung CancerP01CA129243 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Piro Lito · 2007 to 2026
$31.2M
Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA129243NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionERBB2 amplification in lung cancer remains poorly characterized. HER2 (encoded by ERBB2) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase capable of ligand-independent dimerization and signaling when overexpressed, and a common cause of HER2 overexpression is ERBB2 amplification. Here, we evaluated the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of ERBB2-amplified NSCLC and explored a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapeutic strategy.

methodsOur institutional next-generation DNA sequencing data (OncoPanel) from 5769 NSCLC samples (5075 patients) were queried for cases having high-level ERBB2 amplification (≥6 copies). Clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records. Efficacy of the pan-ERBB inhibitor afatinib or HER2 ADCs (trastuzumab deruxtecan and trastuzumab emtansine) was evaluated in NSCLC preclinical models and patients with ERBB2 amplification.

resultsHigh-level ERBB2 amplification was identified in 0.9% of lung adenocarcinomas and reliably predicted overexpression of HER2. ERBB2 amplification events are detected in two distinct clinicopathologic and genomic subsets of NSCLC: as the sole mitogenic driver in tumors arising in patients with a smoking history or as a concomitant alteration with other mitogenic drivers in patients with a light or never smoking history. We further reveal that trastuzumab deruxtecan is effective therapy in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of NSCLC harboring ERBB2 amplification and report two cases of clinical activity of an anti-HER2 ADC in patients who acquired ERBB2 amplification after previous targeted therapy.

conclusionsHigh-level ERBB2 amplification reliably predicts HER2 overexpression in patients with NSCLC, and HER2 ADC is effective therapy in this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGene AmplificationLung NeoplasmsAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAfatinibAgedAnimalsCamptothecinFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesMaleMiceMiddle AgedPrevalenceAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAfatinibCamptothecinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabtrastuzumab deruxtecanBiomarkerERBB2HER2HER2 antibody–drug conjugateLung cancerTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID38154514
PMCPMC11957432
OpenAlexW4390233924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.