Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38154478›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2024

Comparison of Physician-Controlled Maneuver and Assistant-Controlled Maneuver during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Min Je Sung, Jung Hyun Jo, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Moon Jae Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min Je Sung *Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-8851
Jung Hyun Jo *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2641-8873
Hee Seung LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-3160
Jeong Youp ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-8606
Seungmin BangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-8351
Moon Jae ChungDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. mjchung@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5920-8549
Yonsei University · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCannulation of the major papilla is the most challenging part of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for which physician-controlled wire-guided cannulation (PCWGC) and assistant-controlled wire-guided cannulation (ACWGC) are used as the cannulation techniques. PCWGC can reportedly save up to about 30% of the labor cost by reducing the number of assistants. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of PCWGC and ACWGC. MATERIALS AND

methodsOf the 2151 patients aged >20 years (4193 cases) who underwent ERCP at Yonsei University Medical Center between January 2015 and December 2016, 989 were included in this study.

resultsAmong efficacy outcomes, cannulation success rate, rate of precut sphincterotomy (PCWGC vs. ACWGC: 21.3% vs. 25.9%), bile duct cannulation time (PCWGC vs. ACWGC: median 3.0 minutes vs. 3.6 minutes), and total procedure time (PCWGC vs. ACWGC: median 13.6 minutes vs. 13.1 minutes) were not significantly different. Among safety outcomes, lower rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis were observed with PCWGC than with ACWGC (PCWGC vs. ACWGC: 5.8% vs. 8.8%,

conclusionRequiring less assistants, PCWGC showed comparable efficacy and safety to ACWGC. PCWGC can be considered as an alternative option, especially in facilities lacking manpower and resources.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePhysiciansCatheterizationHemorrhageHumansSphincterotomy, Endoscopicassistant-controlled wire-guided cannulationEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyphysician-controlled wire-guided cannulationpost-ERCP pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID38154478
PMCPMC10774649
OpenAlexW4390020237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.