ReviewHearing research2024
Neural hyperactivity and altered envelope encoding in the central auditory system: Changes with advanced age and hearing loss.
Review in Hearing research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical Network Activity Associated With Different Types of Word Recognition Errors by Older Adults.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- [Perception of Mandarin aspirated/unaspirated consonants in children with cochlear implants].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Speech-in-noise discriminability after noise exposure: Insights from a gerbil model of acoustic trauma.PloS one · 2025Article
- Age-Related Differences in EEG-Based Speech Reception Threshold Estimation Using Scalp and Ear-EEG.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal modulations are ubiquitous features of sound signals that are important for auditory perception. The perception of temporal modulations, or temporal processing, is known to decline with aging and hearing loss and negatively impact auditory perception in general and speech recognition specifically. However, neurophysiological literature also provides evidence of exaggerated or enhanced encoding of specifically temporal envelopes in aging and hearing loss, which may arise from changes in inhibitory neurotransmission and neuronal hyperactivity. This review paper describes the physiological changes to the neural encoding of temporal envelopes that have been shown to occur with age and hearing loss and discusses the role of disinhibition and neural hyperactivity in contributing to these changes. Studies in both humans and animal models suggest that aging and hearing loss are associated with stronger neural representations of both periodic amplitude modulation envelopes and of naturalistic speech envelopes, but primarily for low-frequency modulations (<80 Hz). Although the frequency dependence of these results is generally taken as evidence of amplified envelope encoding at the cortex and impoverished encoding at the midbrain and brainstem, there is additional evidence to suggest that exaggerated envelope encoding may also occur subcortically, though only for envelopes with low modulation rates. A better understanding of how temporal envelope encoding is altered in aging and hearing loss, and the contexts in which neural responses are exaggerated/diminished, may aid in the development of interventions, assistive devices, and treatment strategies that work to ameliorate age- and hearing-loss-related auditory perceptual deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.