Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153986›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Non-invasive real-time genomic monitoring of the critically endangered kākāpō.

Lara Urban, Allison K Miller, Daryl Eason, Deidre Vercoe, Megan Shaffer, Shaun P Wilkinson, Gert-Jan Jeunen, Neil J Gemmell, Andrew Digby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Air monitoring by nanopore sequencing.ISME communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Real-time genomics for One Health.Molecular systems biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara UrbanDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-9314
Allison K MillerDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5334-2771
Daryl EasonKākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Deidre VercoeKākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Megan ShafferWilderlab NZ Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand.
Shaun P WilkinsonWilderlab NZ Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand.
Gert-Jan JeunenDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Neil J Gemmell *Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-3637
Andrew Digby *Kākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used non-invasive real-time genomic approaches to monitor one of the last surviving populations of the critically endangered kākāpō (

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalParrotsAnimalsBiodiversityGenomicsHumansSoilDNA, EnvironmentalSoilbiodiversity monitoringecologyeDNAgeneticsgenomicskakapolong-read genomicsnon-invasivereal-time genomics

Identifiers

PMID38153986
PMCPMC10754495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.