ArticleNeuro-oncology2024
Cluster-based prognostication in glioblastoma: Unveiling heterogeneity based on diffusion and perfusion similarities.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Anatomy to Outcome: Linking Glioma Location Patterns to Survival Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicting the region of tumor micro-infiltration in glioblastoma peritumoral edema using a multiparametric mri radiomics model.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Preoperative assessment of intratumor heterogeneity using intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for survival prediction in high-grade gliomas: a feasibility study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Unsupervised radiomics-driven endotyping of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a multimodal characterization of CT imaging, clinical phenotypes, and proteomic profiling.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Decoding Glioblastoma Heterogeneity: Neuroimaging Meets Machine Learning.Neurosurgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the association between diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and survival in glioblastoma is established, prognostic models for patients are lacking. This study employed clustering of functional imaging to identify distinct functional phenotypes in untreated glioblastomas, assessing their prognostic significance for overall survival.
methodsA total of 289 patients with glioblastoma who underwent preoperative multimodal MR imaging were included. Mean values of apparent diffusion coefficient normalized relative cerebral blood volume and relative cerebral blood flow were calculated for different tumor compartments and the entire tumor. Distinct imaging patterns were identified using partition around medoids (PAM) clustering on the training dataset, and their ability to predict overall survival was assessed. Additionally, tree-based machine-learning models were trained to ascertain the significance of features pertaining to cluster membership.
resultsUsing the training dataset (231/289) we identified 2 stable imaging phenotypes through PAM clustering with significantly different overall survival (OS). Validation in an independent test set revealed a high-risk group with a median OS of 10.2 months and a low-risk group with a median OS of 26.6 months (P = 0.012). Patients in the low-risk cluster had high diffusion and low perfusion values throughout, while the high-risk cluster displayed the reverse pattern. Including cluster membership in all multivariate Cox regression analyses improved performance (P ≤ 0.004 each).
conclusionsOur research demonstrates that data-driven clustering can identify clinically relevant, distinct imaging phenotypes, highlighting the potential role of diffusion, and perfusion MRI in predicting survival rates of glioblastoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.