ArticleJAMA health forum2023
Financial Outcomes of Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in Italy.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative analysis of managed entry agreements in Europe: trends, reporting practices, and financial outcomes.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Cost-utility of first-line dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with placebo for patients with pA/rEC: a partitioned survival analysis.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Strategic purchasing of oncology drugs to improve affordability and access to cancer care in India.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Review
- Navigating market access after conditional reimbursement: a communication roadmap for disinvesting orphan drugs.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Model-Based Economic Analyses of Haemophilia from a Societal Perspective: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Review
- Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceutical Products in Three Maghreb Countries: Payer and Supplier Perspectives.Journal of market access & health policy · 2025Article
- Is Brazil following global trends in high-cost treatments? The case of Pompe Disease.Journal of community genetics · 2025Review
- Implementing performance-based risk-sharing agreements in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: a real-world data case study.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Confidential and non-confidential drug rebates in Switzerland, 2013-2023: empirical analysis of drug rebates, trends over time and re-evaluations.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Access in all areas? a round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 4.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Most countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development apply managed entry agreements (MEAs), reimbursement arrangements between manufacturers and payers, to pharmaceuticals. Few data exist regarding their ability to lower expenditures. Objective: To analyze the financial outcomes of MEAs for pharmaceuticals from 2019 to 2021 in Italy. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this observational study of MEAs and pharmaceutical spending in Italy, medications that were monitored through individually collected data and generated paybacks from manufacturers during the 2019 to 2021 study period were included in the analysis. Payback data were collected through pharmaceutical spending monitoring activities conducted by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (Italian Medicines Agency). Expenditure data were collected through the Italian Drug Traceability System. Products were categorized by type of MEA: financial-based, outcome-based, or mixed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was median payback as a proportion of expenditure by category of MEA. Results were also provided by subtype: cost sharing or capping models for financial-based MEAs and risk-sharing or payment-by-result models for outcome-based MEAs. Mixed MEAs were considered when medications had multiple indications with different MEA types. Results: A total of 73 medications with MEAs generated a payback by manufacturers during the study period. Six were either not reimbursable or delivered within the Italian National Health Service, and 5 had incomplete data. Of the 62 medications analyzed, 24 (38.7%) had financial-based MEAs, 30 (48.4%) had outcome-based MEAs, and 8 (12.9%) had mixed MEAs. A total payback amount of €327.5 million was calculated during the 3 years, corresponding to 0.9% of the €41.1 billion of total expenditures for medications purchased by public health facilities in Italy. Financial-based MEAs returned the highest payback revenues, €158.1 million; the outcome-based MEAs and mixed MEAs generated smaller paybacks of €74.5 million and €94.9 million, respectively. Overall, the median proportion of payback to expenditure on the medications analyzed was 3.8%. For mixed MEAs, the payback-to-expenditure proportion was 6.7%; for outcome-based MEAs, 3.3%; and for financial-based MEAs, 3.7%. Conclusions and Relevance: This observational study found limited evidence that MEAs lower pharmaceutical expenditures. Determining criteria for prioritizing MEA use, identifying potential design changes, and improving implementation may be needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.