Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153749›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.

Traci-Lin Goddin, Haojue Yu, David S Friedman, Cynthia Owsley, MiYoung Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Rod-Dominant Mesopic Conditions on Spatial Summation and Surround Suppression in Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Age-Related Changes in Mesopic Reading Vision Across Adulthood.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Traci-Lin GoddinDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Haojue YuDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
David S FriedmanMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Cynthia OwsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
MiYoung KwonDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Perceptual mechanisms underlying reading difficulties in glaucomaR01EY027857 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KWON, MIYOUNG · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Despite good photopic visual acuity, glaucoma patients report difficulty performing daily activities under dim light such as reading. Here we investigated the impact of mesopic lighting conditions on reading vision of glaucoma patients. Methods: The study design included 39 patients with glaucoma and 40 healthy controls. Reading vision was assessed with MNREAD charts under mesopic (2 cd/m2) and photopic (220 cd/m2) conditions. Four reading indexes: maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS), reading acuity (RA), and reading accessibility index (ACC) were obtained from the MNREAD test yielding a plot of reading speed versus print size. Results: Compared to photopic conditions, reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05). For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), MRS and ACC decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively under mesopic conditions; CPS and RA increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively. Moreover, under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, but the difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity. Conclusions: Mesopic conditions make reading more challenging for both healthy controls and glaucoma patients. However, reading in dim light appears to be more burdensome for glaucoma patients. Mesopic reading tests mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions.

Indexed as

Color VisionGlaucomaAdultHumansLightingReadingRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID38153749
PMCPMC10756241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.